In re: Kyle Hermesch
| In re: Kyle Martin Hermesch |
| United States of America |
| 24-10259 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Kyle Martin Hermesch for writ of mandamus [2]. Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/22/2024. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 04/26/2024 for Petitioner Kyle Martin Hermesch. Date of Service: 03/11/2024. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: No COS to DC Judge and fee due [24-10259] (CAG) [Entered: 03/27/2024 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [24-10259] (CAG) [Entered: 03/27/2024 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Kyle Hermesch | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Kyle Martin Hermesch | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Martin Hermesch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Amanda R. Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
