Computer Sciences v. Tata Consultancy
Plaintiff: Computer Sciences Corporation
Defendant: Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Case Number: 24-10749
Filed: August 16, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2024 Filing 46 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited. Extension Granted to and including 12/04/2024. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/04/2024 for Appellants Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited [24-10749] (RA) [Entered: 10/03/2024 01:57 PM]
October 3, 2024 Filing 45 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited for filing Appellants' Opening Brief until 12/04/2024 [24-10749] (Arian Joseph Koochesfahani ) [Entered: 10/03/2024 12:17 PM]
September 26, 2024 Filing 43 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kurt Pankratz for party(s) Appellee Computer Sciences Corporation, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (MFY) [Entered: 09/26/2024 01:43 PM]
September 25, 2024 Filing 42 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-10749] (Kurt Pankratz ) [Entered: 09/25/2024 04:33 PM]
September 25, 2024 Filing 41 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/04/2024 for Appellants Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited. [24-10749] (DDL) [Entered: 09/25/2024 08:43 AM]
September 25, 2024 Filing 40 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits are on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on file in District Court? No. [24-10749] (DDL) [Entered: 09/25/2024 08:42 AM]
September 23, 2024 Filing 39 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-10749] (DDL) [Entered: 09/23/2024 10:34 AM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 37 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Matthew Williamson for Appellant Tata America International Corporation in 24-10749, Attorney John Matthew Williamson for Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited in 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:28 PM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 36 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Luke Joseph McCammon for party(s) Appellant Tata America International Corporation Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:25 PM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 35 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Rajeev Gupta for party(s) Appellant Tata America International Corporation Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:23 PM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 34 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Parmanand K. Sharma for party(s) Appellant Tata America International Corporation Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:21 PM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 32 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) John Matthew Williamson for party(s) Appellant Tata America International Corporation Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:17 PM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 31 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (John Matthew Williamson ) [Entered: 09/05/2024 12:09 PM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 30 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Luke Joseph McCammon ) [Entered: 09/05/2024 11:57 AM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 29 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Rajeev Gupta ) [Entered: 09/05/2024 11:54 AM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 28 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Parmanand K. Sharma ) [Entered: 09/05/2024 11:50 AM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 27 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Parmanand K. Sharma ) [Entered: 09/05/2024 11:46 AM]
September 3, 2024 Filing 25 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Arian Joseph Koochesfahani for party(s) Appellant Tata America International Corporation Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 09/03/2024 08:34 AM]
September 1, 2024 Filing 24 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Arian Joseph Koochesfahani ) [Entered: 09/01/2024 06:34 PM]
August 30, 2024 Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jacob Michael Bartels Bliss for party(s) Appellant Tata America International Corporation Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 08/30/2024 03:26 PM]
August 30, 2024 Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Jacob Michael Bartels Bliss ) [Entered: 08/30/2024 12:43 PM]
August 26, 2024 Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Christopher Beau Carter for party(s) Appellee Computer Sciences Corporation, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (TST) [Entered: 08/26/2024 03:15 PM]
August 26, 2024 Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Thomas Edward O'Brien for party(s) Appellee Computer Sciences Corporation, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (TST) [Entered: 08/26/2024 03:03 PM]
August 26, 2024 Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Macey Reasoner Stokes for party(s) Appellee Computer Sciences Corporation, in case 24-10749 [24-10749] (TST) [Entered: 08/26/2024 02:50 PM]
August 26, 2024 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Christopher Beau Carter ) [Entered: 08/26/2024 01:50 PM]
August 26, 2024 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10749] (Thomas Edward O'Brien ) [Entered: 08/26/2024 01:47 PM]
August 26, 2024 Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-10749] (Macey Reasoner Stokes ) [Entered: 08/26/2024 01:43 PM]
August 26, 2024 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:19-CV-970. Electronic ROA due on 09/10/2024. [24-10749] (PAC) [Entered: 08/26/2024 08:56 AM]
August 23, 2024 Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [24-10749] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 08/23/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Bash; Attorney for Appellee: Sumner [24-10749] (John Franklin Bash ) [Entered: 08/23/2024 04:42 PM]
August 23, 2024 Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Franklin Bash for Appellant Tata America International Corporation in 24-10749, Attorney John Franklin Bash for Appellant Tata Consultancy Services Limited in 24-10749 [24-10749] (ELB) [Entered: 08/23/2024 04:41 PM]
August 23, 2024 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. John Franklin Bash for Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-10749] (John Franklin Bash ) [Entered: 08/23/2024 04:10 PM]
August 22, 2024 Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/06/2024 for Appellants Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited [24-10749] (MFY) [Entered: 08/22/2024 04:21 PM]
August 16, 2024 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited [24-10749] (MFY) [Entered: 08/16/2024 11:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Computer Sciences v. Tata Consultancy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tata America International Corporation
Represented By: John Matthew Williamson
Represented By: Parmanand K. Sharma
Represented By: Luke Joseph McCammon
Represented By: Arian Joseph Koochesfahani
Represented By: Rajeev Gupta
Represented By: Jacob Michael Bartels Bliss
Represented By: John Franklin Bash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Represented By: John Matthew Williamson
Represented By: Parmanand K. Sharma
Represented By: Luke Joseph McCammon
Represented By: Arian Joseph Koochesfahani
Represented By: Rajeev Gupta
Represented By: Jacob Michael Bartels Bliss
Represented By: John Franklin Bash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Computer Sciences Corporation
Represented By: Justin Victor Sumner
Represented By: Kurt Pankratz
Represented By: Thomas Edward O'Brien
Represented By: Christopher Beau Carter
Represented By: Macey Reasoner Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?