Garcia v. Kacsmaryk
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Garcia
Respondent: Matthew Joseph Kacsmaryk, District Judge, United States Marshal, Lee Ann Reno, Magistrate Judge and Christopher Forbis, Sheriff
Case Number: 24-10774
Filed: August 23, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 17, 2025 Garcia v. Kacsmaryk

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2024 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:24-CV-153. Electronic ROA due on 10/23/2024. [24-10774] (CAG) [Entered: 10/08/2024 03:26 PM]
October 8, 2024 Filing 9 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Ray Garcia [ # 8 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 12/05/2024 for Appellant Daniel Ray Garcia [24-10774] (AMD) [Entered: 10/08/2024 03:04 PM]
October 7, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Ray Garcia to extend time to file brief as appellant [8], to proceed in forma pauperis [8] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 12/05/2024 for Appellant Daniel Ray Garcia. [24-10774] (AMD) [Entered: 10/08/2024 03:02 PM]
September 26, 2024 Filing 7 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 11/05/2024 for Appellant Daniel Ray Garcia. Fee deadline updated to 11/05/2024 for Appellant Daniel Ray Garcia [24-10774] (CAG) [Entered: 09/26/2024 10:47 AM]
September 26, 2024 Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/17/2024 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Daniel Ray Garcia. [24-10774] (CAG) [Entered: 09/26/2024 10:44 AM]
August 27, 2024 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 09/11/2024 for Appellant Daniel Ray Garcia [24-10774] (SH) [Entered: 08/27/2024 11:37 AM]
August 23, 2024 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Ray Garcia [24-10774] (SH) [Entered: 08/23/2024 11:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Garcia v. Kacsmaryk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Joseph Kacsmaryk, District Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Marshal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lee Ann Reno, Magistrate Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Christopher Forbis, Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Garcia
Represented By: Daniel Ray Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?