USA v. Jackson
| United States of America |
| Samuel Jackson |
| 24-11062 |
| December 9, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:24-CR-138-1. Electronic ROA due on 02/18/2025. [24-11062] (RA) [Entered: 02/03/2025 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Saenz, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 01/29/2025 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [24-11062] (RA) [Entered: 02/03/2025 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellant Mr. Samuel Jackson is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [24-11062] (Debbie Saenz ) [Entered: 01/29/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Saenz, Est. Completion Dt: 01/30/2025, Est. No.of Pgs: 85, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 12/30/2024, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 01/30/2025, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 07/24/2024 , Sentencing 11/26/2024. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 01/30/2025 for Debbie Saenz, Court Reporter [24-11062] (CAS) [Entered: 01/05/2025 06:30 PM] |
| Filing 8 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Ms. Debbie Saenz. [24-11062] (Debbie Saenz ) [Entered: 12/30/2024 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Samuel Jackson. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Saenz, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 07/24/2024 , Sentencing 11/26/2024. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 01/02/2025 for Debbie Saenz, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 6 ] [24-11062] (CAS) [Entered: 12/23/2024 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Samuel Jacksonfor the Court to process. Date of service: 12/18/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gilstrap; Attorney for Appellant: White. [24-11062] (Harry E. White ) [Entered: 12/18/2024 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 12/24/2024 for Appellant Samuel Jackson [24-11062] (RLJ) [Entered: 12/09/2024 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Mr. Harry E. White for Mr. Samuel Jackson. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: NTX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 4:24-CR-138-1 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 1 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 12/08/2024 [24-11062] (RLJ) [Entered: 12/09/2024 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Samuel Jackson [24-11062] (RLJ) [Entered: 12/09/2024 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jackson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Samuel Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Harry E. White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Stephen S. Gilstrap |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
