Smith v. Lumpkin
Traelyn Smith |
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
24-20024 |
January 18, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-20024] (RLL) [Entered: 02/09/2024 02:43 PM] |
Filing 14 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Ms. Traelyn Smith in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 13 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA). Date of Service: 02/08/2024. [14] [24-20024] (RLL) [Entered: 02/08/2024 03:57 PM] |
Filing 13 MOTION for certificate of appealability [13]. Date of service: 02/08/2024. [24-20024] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Traelyn Smith for certificate of appealability [13]. Date of service: 02/08/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Spolin; Attorney for Appellee: Wawrzynski [24-20024] (Aaron Spolin ) [Entered: 02/08/2024 03:06 PM] |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-1321. Electronic ROA due on 02/22/2024. [24-20024] (AMD) [Entered: 02/07/2024 02:42 PM] |
Filing 11 FEE PAID by Appellant Ms. Traelyn Smith. Fee deadline satisfied [24-20024] (AMD) [Entered: 02/07/2024 02:41 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Aaron Spolin for Appellant Traelyn Smith in 24-20024 [24-20024] (AMD) [Entered: 02/07/2024 02:40 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-20024] (Aaron Spolin ) [Entered: 02/06/2024 10:11 AM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephanie Wawrzynski for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 24-20024 [24-20024] (AMD) [Entered: 01/23/2024 04:46 PM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Stephanie Wawrzynski for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-20024] (Stephanie Wawrzynski ) [Entered: 01/22/2024 03:13 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 02/05/2024 for Appellant Traelyn Smith [24-20024] (TNM) [Entered: 01/19/2024 02:30 PM] |
Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Traelyn Smith [24-20024] (TNM) [Entered: 01/18/2024 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Smith v. Lumpkin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Traelyn Smith | |
Represented By: | Traelyn Smith |
Represented By: | Aaron Spolin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
Represented By: | Stephanie Wawrzynski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.