Diogu v. Leva
| Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, as next friends of DKKD III and NMKD, minor children and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly, Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, Next Friend of DKKDIII, Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, Next Friend of NMKD and Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, LL.M., as next friends of DKKD III and NMKD minor children, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| Jeff Leva, Sandy Dasigenis, Lilian Poetker, doing business as Foreclosure Network of Teas, Kim E. Lewinski, Bradley E. Rauch, Michael James Durrschmidt, Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C., Lilian Poetker, doing business as Foreclosure Network of Texas, Kim E. Lewinski, Esquire, Bradley E. Rauch, Esquire and Michael James Durrschmidt, Esquire |
| 24-20093 |
| March 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 COURT ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal filed by Appellee Mr. Diogu Kalu Diogu, II [ # 12 ]. Mandate issue date is 05/24/2024. [24-20093] (CCR) [Entered: 05/02/2024 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 16 The Motion to dismiss appeal filed by Appellee Mr. Diogu Kalu Diogu, II in 24-20093 [ # 12 ] has been made sufficient. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Rpl deadline satisfied. [24-20093] (CCR) [Entered: 04/25/2024 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Ms. Sandy Dasigenis, Mr. Michael James Durrschmidt, Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C., Mr. Jeff Leva, Ms. Kim E. Lewinski, Ms. Lilian Poetker and Mr. Bradley E. Rauch [15] to the to dismiss appeal filed by Appellee Mr. Diogu Kalu Diogu, II [ # 12 ] Date of Service: 04/22/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Diogu; Attorney for Appellant: Durrschmidt. [24-20093] (Michael James Durrschmidt ) [Entered: 04/22/2024 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 14 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the certificate of interested persons/proposed sufficient motion received from Appellee Mr. Diogu Kalu Diogu, II because the proposed sufficient motion was incorrectly re-filed on the docket. Please refer to the correspondence of April 19, 2024. [24-20093] (CCR) [Entered: 04/22/2024 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 12 OPPOSED MOTION to dismiss the appeal [12]. Date of service: 04/18/2024 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: No Certificate of Interested Persons. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 04/29/2024 for Appellee Diogu Kalu Diogu II. Response/Opposition due on 04/29/2024. [24-20093] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee Mr. Diogu Kalu Diogu, II to dismiss the appeal [12]. Date of service: 04/18/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Diogu; Attorney for Appellant: Durrschmidt [24-20093] (Diogu Kalu Diogu II) [Entered: 04/18/2024 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 11 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. SPECIAL ISSUES TO BE BRIEFED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/13/2024 for Appellants Sandy Dasigenis, Michael James Durrschmidt, Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C., Jeff Leva, Kim E. Lewinski, Lilian Poetker and Bradley E. Rauch. [24-20093] (DDL) [Entered: 04/01/2024 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-20093] (DDL) [Entered: 04/01/2024 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael James Durrschmidt for Appellant Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C. in 24-20093, Attorney Michael James Durrschmidt for Appellant Michael James Durrschmidt in 24-20093, Attorney Michael James Durrschmidt for Appellant Bradley E. Rauch in 24-20093, Attorney Michael James Durrschmidt for Appellant Kim E. Lewinski in 24-20093, Attorney Michael James Durrschmidt for Appellant Lilian Poetker in 24-20093, Attorney Michael James Durrschmidt for Appellant Sandy Dasigenis in 24-20093, Attorney Michael James Durrschmidt for Appellant Jeff Leva in 24-20093 [24-20093] (CCR) [Entered: 03/28/2024 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [24-20093] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Sandy Dasigenis, Mr. Michael James Durrschmidt, Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C., Mr. Jeff Leva, Ms. Kim E. Lewinski, Ms. Lilian Poetker and Mr. Bradley E. Rauch advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 03/25/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Diogu; Attorney for Appellant: Durrschmidt [24-20093] (Michael James Durrschmidt ) [Entered: 03/25/2024 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael James Durrschmidt, Esq. for Ms. Sandy Dasigenis, Mr. Michael James Durrschmidt, Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C., Mr. Jeff Leva, Ms. Kim E. Lewinski, Ms. Lilian Poetker and Mr. Bradley E. Rauch for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-20093] (Michael James Durrschmidt ) [Entered: 03/25/2024 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-3299. Electronic ROA due on 04/04/2024. [24-20093] (AMD) [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: OK to Process with Special Issues to be Briefed. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-20093] (AMD) [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Sandy Dasigenis, Mr. Michael James Durrschmidt, Hirsch & Westheimer, P.C., Mr. Jeff Leva, Ms. Kim E. Lewinski, Ms. Lilian Poetker and Mr. Bradley E. Rauch [24-20093] (AMD) [Entered: 03/12/2024 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
