Mendez v. Lumpkin
| Jose Guillermo Mendez |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 24-20222 |
| May 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Guillermo Mendez [ # 13 ] Motion due deadline updated to 09/09/2024 for Appellant Jose Guillermo Mendez. Brief in Support deadline updated to 09/09/2024 for Appellant Jose Guillermo Mendez [24-20222] (CCR) [Entered: 07/16/2024 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Guillermo Mendez to extend time to comply with COA requirements until 09/09/2024 [13]. Date of service: 07/09/2024 [24-20222] (CCR) [Entered: 07/16/2024 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-20222] (RLL) [Entered: 07/01/2024 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-3095. Electronic ROA due on 07/11/2024. [24-20222] (CCR) [Entered: 06/26/2024 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 08/05/2024 for Appellant Jose Guillermo Mendez. Brief in Support due on 08/05/2024 for Appellant Jose Guillermo Mendez [24-20222] (CCR) [Entered: 06/26/2024 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/18/2024 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Jose Guillermo Mendez.Fee deadline satisfied [24-20222] (CCR) [Entered: 06/26/2024 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stephanie Wawrzynski for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 24-20222 [24-20222] (CCR) [Entered: 06/25/2024 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-20222] (Stephanie Wawrzynski ) [Entered: 06/25/2024 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 06/20/2024 for Appellant Jose Guillermo Mendez [24-20222] (ABT) [Entered: 06/04/2024 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Guillermo Mendez. [24-20222] (RLL) [Entered: 05/22/2024 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mendez v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Guillermo Mendez | |
| Represented By: | Jose Guillermo Mendez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Wawrzynski |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
