Lightfoot v. Gilley
Plaintiff: Chad Lightfoot
Defendant: Gary Gilley, Patricia Miller, Chief of Security Richland Parish Detention Center, Big Show, Lieutenant, Deputy Austin, Deputy Marvel and James LeBlanc
Case Number: 24-30046
Filed: January 22, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2024 Filing 16 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee. [16] [24-30046] (SEP) [Entered: 03/05/2024 03:06 PM]
March 5, 2024 Filing 15 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising the filing fee is due immediately [24-30046] (MRW) [Entered: 03/05/2024 12:50 PM]
March 4, 2024 Filing 18 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising the order of 2/15/24 is the court's order ruling on the motion for stay [24-30046] (MRW) [Entered: 03/08/2024 12:37 PM]
February 20, 2024 Filing 14 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 02/22/2024 for Appellant Chad Lightfoot [24-30046] (MAS) [Entered: 02/20/2024 01:45 PM]
February 15, 2024 Filing 13 CLERK ORDER denying Motion to stay further proceedings in this court filed by Appellant Mr. Chad Lightfoot [ # 8 ] [24-30046] (MRW) [Entered: 02/15/2024 03:13 PM]
February 15, 2024 Filing 10 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Memorandum in Support of Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Chad Lightfoot because you have had 3 or more cases dismissed as frivolous. Pursuant to the 3 strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915 you must pay the $605.00 appellate docketing fee [24-30046] (MRW) [Entered: 02/15/2024 02:44 PM]
February 12, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chad Lightfoot to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: until the pauper status has been determined. [24-30046] (MRW) [Entered: 02/15/2024 08:25 AM]
February 9, 2024 Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Chad Lightfoot because in accordance with the clerk's notice of 1/23/24, you have had 3 or more cases dismissed as frivolous. Pursuant to the 3 strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915 you must pay the $605.00 appellate docketing fee [24-30046] (MRW) [Entered: 02/09/2024 01:42 PM]
February 2, 2024 Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Authorization received from Appellant Mr. Chad Lightfoot because in accordance with the clerk's notice of 1/23/24, the $605.00 filing fee is due 2/7/24 [24-30046] (MRW) [Entered: 02/07/2024 02:54 PM]
January 23, 2024 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 02/07/2024 for Appellant Chad Lightfoot [24-30046] (AMD) [Entered: 01/23/2024 04:07 PM]
January 22, 2024 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chad Lightfoot [24-30046] (AMD) [Entered: 01/22/2024 09:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lightfoot v. Gilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Lightfoot
Represented By: Chad Lightfoot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Gilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief of Security Richland Parish Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Big Show, Lieutenant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Marvel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James LeBlanc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?