Damond v. City of Rayville
| Glenn Damond |
| City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity, Terri Klick, in her Individual Capacity & Official Capacity, Kindra Vaughn, in her Individual Capacity & Official Capacity, Rodney Rigor, in his Individual Capacity, Master Sergeant Rushing, in his Individual Capacity, Chief of Security Duchesne, in his Individual Capacity and James M. LeBlanc, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity |
| 24-30289 |
| May 1, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 LETTER REISSUED due to Address Change. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 07/29/2024 for Appellant Glenn Damond [24-30289] (WMJ) [Entered: 06/17/2024 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 07/08/2024 for Appellant Glenn Damond. [24-30289] (DDL) [Entered: 05/28/2024 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-30289] (DDL) [Entered: 05/28/2024 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:23-CV-1810. Electronic ROA due on 05/20/2024. [24-30289] (RA) [Entered: 05/03/2024 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-30289] (RA) [Entered: 05/03/2024 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Glenn Damond [24-30289] (RA) [Entered: 05/01/2024 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.