LaMartina v. Madden
| Elise LaMartina |
| Gerald Sticker, Clay Madden, Benjamin Cato, Mandeville City, Louisiana, Bernard Plaia, David Parnell, Tammy Brant, Blue Williams, L.L.C. and Stephen Baehr |
| 24-30381 |
| June 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Elise LaMartina. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 09/11/2024 for Appellees Stephen Baehr, Blue Williams, L.L.C., Tammy Brant, Benjamin Cato, Clay Madden, Mandeville City, David Parnell, Bernard Plaia and Gerald Sticker [24-30381] (RA) [Entered: 08/13/2024 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/12/2024 for Appellant Elise LaMartina. [24-30381] (DDL) [Entered: 07/02/2024 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-30381] (DDL) [Entered: 07/02/2024 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-1030. Electronic ROA due on 07/03/2024. [24-30381] (RA) [Entered: 06/18/2024 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-30381] (RA) [Entered: 06/18/2024 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Elise LaMartina [24-30381] (RA) [Entered: 06/17/2024 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
