Powell v. Decicco
| Pamela Short Powell, individually & on behalf of Diana Lynn Short, Margaret Julia Short, Daniel Alan Short, Jack Warren Short, Jr. |
| Anthony Decicco, Brent J. Laliberte, Jane Doe, 1, John Doe and Vanity Decicco |
| 24-30402 |
| June 25, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:24-CV-511. Electronic ROA due on 09/05/2024. [24-30402] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/21/2024 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Pamela Short Powell to proceed in forma pauperis (with incorporated financial affidavit) [9] Fee deadline canceled. [24-30402] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/21/2024 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/25/2024 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Pamela Short Powell. Fee due on 08/19/2024 for Appellant Pamela Short Powell [24-30402] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/02/2024 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for district court docket entry 12, motion to reconsider. IFPPDC. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-30402] (RA) [Entered: 06/27/2024 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF PARTIES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [24-30402] (RA) [Entered: 06/25/2024 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Pamela Short Powell [24-30402] (RA) [Entered: 06/25/2024 04:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
