Hicks v. Hooper
| Jordan Hicks |
| Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary |
| 24-30458 |
| July 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Jordan Hicks in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 17 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA). Brief in Support deadline satisfied. Date of Service: 09/10/2024. [18] [24-30458] (RLL) [Entered: 09/10/2024 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION for certificate of appealability (WITH INCORPORATED BRIEF IN SUPPORT) [17]. Date of service: 09/10/2024 Motion due deadline satisfied. [24-30458] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jordan Hicks for certificate of appealability [17]. Date of service: 09/10/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Harrell; Attorney for Appellee: Long [24-30458] (Justin Caine Harrell ) [Entered: 09/10/2024 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Justin Caine Harrell for Appellant Jordan Hicks in 24-30458 [24-30458] (TST) [Entered: 09/09/2024 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Justin Caine Harrell, Esq. for Mr. Jordan Hicks for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-30458] (Justin Caine Harrell ) [Entered: 09/09/2024 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 13 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 09/10/2024 for Appellant Jordan Hicks. Brief in Support due on 09/10/2024 for Appellant Jordan Hicks [24-30458] (DDL) [Entered: 08/01/2024 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-30458] (DDL) [Entered: 08/01/2024 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andrea F. Long for Appellee Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary in 24-30458 [24-30458] (ABT) [Entered: 07/23/2024 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-30458] (Andrea F. Long ) [Entered: 07/22/2024 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:22-CV-5113. Electronic ROA due on 08/06/2024. [24-30458] (RA) [Entered: 07/22/2024 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-30458] (RA) [Entered: 07/22/2024 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jordan Hicks [24-30458] (RA) [Entered: 07/19/2024 11:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hicks v. Hooper | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary | |
| Represented By: | Andrea F. Long |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jordan Hicks | |
| Represented By: | Justin Caine Harrell Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.