Naquin v. Terrebonne Prsh Sch Board
| Terrebonne Parish School District, Gregory Harding, individually and in his official capacity as President of Terrebonne Parish School Board, Terrebonne Parish School Board and Philip Martin, individually and in his official capacity as superintendent of the Terrebonne Parish School District |
| Louis Roy Koerner, Jr. |
| 24-30551 |
| August 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 OPPOSED MOTION to reopen case [18] Default has NOT been remedied. [24-30551] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Louis Roy Koerner, Jr. to reopen case [ # 16 ] [18]. Date of service: 10/23/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Duval; Attorney for Appellant: Koerner [24-30551] (Louis Roy Koerner Jr.) [Entered: 10/23/2024 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 16 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to file appellant's brief and record excerpts [16] [24-30551] (MRW) [Entered: 10/21/2024 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stanwood Robert Duval for Appellee Gregory Harding in 24-30551, Attorney Stanwood Robert Duval for Appellee Philip Martin in 24-30551, Attorney Stanwood Robert Duval for Appellee Terrebonne Parish School District in 24-30551, Attorney Stanwood Robert Duval for Appellee Terrebonne Parish School Board in 24-30551 [24-30551] (SH) [Entered: 09/17/2024 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Stanwood Robert Duval for Mr. Gregory Harding, Mr. Philip Martin, Terrebonne Parish School Board and Terrebonne Parish School District for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-30551] (Stanwood Robert Duval ) [Entered: 09/16/2024 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/15/2024 for Appellant Louis Roy Koerner Jr.. [24-30551] (DDL) [Entered: 09/05/2024 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-30551] (DDL) [Entered: 09/05/2024 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-1144. Electronic ROA due on 09/13/2024. [24-30551] (RA) [Entered: 08/29/2024 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Louis Roy Koerner Jr. for Appellant Louis Roy Koerner Jr. in 24-30551 [24-30551] (SH) [Entered: 08/29/2024 08:18 AM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [24-30551] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Louis Roy Koerner, Jr. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 08/28/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Duval; Attorney for Appellant: Koerner [24-30551] (Louis Roy Koerner Jr.) [Entered: 08/28/2024 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-30551] (Louis Roy Koerner Jr.) [Entered: 08/28/2024 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/12/2024 for Appellant Louis Roy Koerner Jr. [24-30551] (RA) [Entered: 08/28/2024 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Louis Roy Koerner, Jr. [24-30551] (RA) [Entered: 08/26/2024 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
