AstraZeneca v. Murrill
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. |
Liz Murrill, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Louisiana |
Louisiana Primary Care Association |
24-30651 |
October 11, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Ronald S. Connelly for Appellee Louisiana Primary Care Association in 24-30651 [24-30651] (SH) [Entered: 11/13/2024 09:49 AM] |
Filing 26 CASE CAPTION updated. Appellee Louisiana Primary Care Association added to case. [24-30651] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/13/2024 09:37 AM] |
Filing 24 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/23/2024 for Appellant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.. [24-30651] (DDL) [Entered: 11/11/2024 09:04 AM] |
Filing 25 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-30651] (Ronald S. Connelly ) [Entered: 11/11/2024 03:57 PM] |
Filing 23 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-30651] (DDL) [Entered: 11/11/2024 09:04 AM] |
Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Brent Hicks for Appellee Liz Murrill in 24-30651 [24-30651] (SH) [Entered: 10/30/2024 04:15 PM] |
Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-30651] (Michael Brent Hicks ) [Entered: 10/30/2024 12:36 PM] |
Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Riley T. Svikhart for party(s) Appellee Liz Murrill, in case 24-30651 [24-30651] (MRW) [Entered: 10/29/2024 02:05 PM] |
Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-30651] (Riley T. Svikhart ) [Entered: 10/29/2024 01:09 PM] |
Filing 17 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [24-30651] (MRW) [Entered: 10/18/2024 03:38 PM] |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.for the Court to process. Date of service: 10/18/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barriere, Handwerker, Kedem, Wirth; Attorney for Appellee: Hicks. [24-30651] (Allon Kedem ) [Entered: 10/18/2024 03:33 PM] |
Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stephen K. Wirth for party(s) Appellant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P., in case 24-30651 [24-30651] (MRW) [Entered: 10/18/2024 01:33 PM] |
Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-30651] (Stephen K. Wirth ) [Entered: 10/18/2024 01:18 PM] |
Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeffrey Handwerker for party(s) Appellant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P., in case 24-30651 [24-30651] (MRW) [Entered: 10/18/2024 01:06 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Allon Kedem for party(s) Appellant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P., in case 24-30651 [24-30651] (MRW) [Entered: 10/18/2024 01:04 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-30651] (Jeffrey Handwerker ) [Entered: 10/18/2024 12:59 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-30651] (Allon Kedem ) [Entered: 10/18/2024 12:51 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:23-CV-1042. Electronic ROA due on 10/31/2024. [24-30651] (MRW) [Entered: 10/16/2024 01:40 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-30651] (MRW) [Entered: 10/16/2024 01:38 PM] |
Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. [24-30651] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/11/2024 05:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.