In re: Timothy Guidry
| In re: Timothy Guidry |
| 24-30780 |
| December 16, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for rehearing en banc received from Movant Mr. Timothy Guidry because there is no recourse for successive petitions [24-30780] (MVM) [Entered: 02/12/2025 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 18 COURT ORDER denying Motion to file successive petition filed by Movant Mr. Timothy Guidry [ # 2 ]. [24-30780] (MVM) [Entered: 01/14/2025 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [24-30780] (RLL) [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Movant Mr. Timothy Guidry for authorization to file successive petition 2254 petition.[2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 12/13/2024. Date of service: 12/09/2024. [24-30780] (RLL) [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [24-30780] (RLL) [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Timothy Guidry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Timothy Guidry | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Guidry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
