In re: Philip Emerson, Jr.
In re: Philip James Emerson, Jr. |
24-40107 |
February 19, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [24-40107] (RLL) [Entered: 02/19/2024 02:51 PM] |
Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Philip James Emerson, Jr. for writ of mandamus [2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 02/16/2024. Fee due on 03/18/2024 for Petitioner Philip James Emerson Jr. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 03/18/2024 for Petitioner Philip James Emerson Jr., disqualification of Robert S. Davis [2]. Date of Service: 02/16/2024. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: certificate of service must comply with the requirements of FRAP 21(a)(1) to include service upon the originating court judge. [24-40107] (RLL) [Entered: 02/19/2024 02:33 PM] |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [24-40107] (RLL) [Entered: 02/19/2024 02:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Philip Emerson, Jr. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: Philip James Emerson, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Philip James Emerson Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.