Estate of the Decedent v. Hawthorne
| Cherrie E. Coates, Individually and as Next Friend for K.A.D and M.J.D., Minors and Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates |
| Chambers County, Texas, Brian C. Hawthorne and Chambers County Sheriff's Office |
| 24-40561 |
| August 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Estate of the Decedent v. Hawthorne |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/30/2024 for Appellants Cherrie E. Coates and Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates. [24-40561] (DDL) [Entered: 09/20/2024 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-40561] (DDL) [Entered: 09/20/2024 08:13 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William S. Helfand for party(s) Appellee Brian C. Hawthorne Appellee Chambers County Sheriff's Office Appellee Chambers County, Texas, in case 24-40561 [24-40561] (TST) [Entered: 09/19/2024 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Norman Ray Giles for party(s) Appellee Brian C. Hawthorne Appellee Chambers County Sheriff's Office Appellee Chambers County, Texas, in case 24-40561 [24-40561] (TST) [Entered: 09/19/2024 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-40561] (William S. Helfand ) [Entered: 09/19/2024 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Norman Ray Giles for Chambers County Sheriff's Office, Chambers County, Texas and Mr. Brian C. Hawthorne for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-40561] (Norman Ray Giles ) [Entered: 09/19/2024 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:23-CV-210. Electronic ROA due on 09/20/2024. [24-40561] (ABT) [Entered: 09/05/2024 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Philip John Orth III for Appellant Cherrie E. Coates in 24-40561, Attorney Philip John Orth III for Appellant Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates in 24-40561 [24-40561] (TST) [Entered: 09/05/2024 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/20/2024 for Appellants Cherrie E. Coates and Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates [24-40561] (TST) [Entered: 09/05/2024 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Cherrie E. Coates and Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [24-40561] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Cherrie E. Coates and Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 09/05/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Giles; Attorney for Appellant: Orth [24-40561] (Philip John Orth III) [Entered: 09/05/2024 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Philip John Orth, III for Ms. Cherrie E. Coates and Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-40561] (Philip John Orth III) [Entered: 09/05/2024 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Cherrie E. Coates and The Estate of the Decedent Dontriel Jovan Coates. [24-40561] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/29/2024 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.