Thomas v. Collier
| Destry Earl Thomas |
| Candice Hannel, Assistant Warden, TDCJ-ID, John or Jane Doe, Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas, Megan R. Thompson, Law Librarian, John or Jane Doe, Access to the Courts, Edward A. Molina, Law Librarian, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Adrian A. Amonett, Senior Warden, TDCJ-ID, Linda C. Cruz, John or Jane Doe, Region 4, TDCJ-ID and Placido Samaniego, Jr., Assistant Warden, TDCJ-ID |
| 24-40616 |
| September 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42, for failure to pay fee [7]. [24-40616] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/30/2024 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 6 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 10/24/2024, for Appellant Destry Earl Thomas. [24-40616] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/16/2024 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved because prisoner is a three strikes litigant. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 10/09/2024 for Appellant Destry Earl Thomas [24-40616] (AMD) [Entered: 09/24/2024 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Destry Earl Thomas [24-40616] (AMD) [Entered: 09/19/2024 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
