Esparza v. Advanced Network
| Teresa Esparza |
| Advanced Network Management, Incorporated, doing business as ANM, doing business as Network Management, Inc. |
| 24-50024 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/09/2024 for Appellant Teresa Esparza. [24-50024] (DDL) [Entered: 02/29/2024 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 17 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-50024] (DDL) [Entered: 02/29/2024 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:21-CV-199. Electronic ROA due on 03/01/2024. [24-50024] (JJF) [Entered: 02/15/2024 08:16 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kirk Cooper for Appellant Teresa Esparza in 24-50024 [24-50024] (AMD) [Entered: 01/31/2024 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Teresa Esparza advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 01/30/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cooper; Attorney for Appellees: Crooks, Rudd [24-50024] (Kirk Cooper ) [Entered: 01/30/2024 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-50024] (Kirk Cooper ) [Entered: 01/30/2024 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Rudd for Appellee Advanced Network Management, Incorporated in 24-50024 [24-50024] (TNM) [Entered: 01/26/2024 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David Grant Crooks for party(s) Appellee Advanced Network Management, Incorporated, in case 24-50024 [24-50024] (TNM) [Entered: 01/26/2024 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Rudd for Advanced Network Management, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-50024] (Michael Rudd ) [Entered: 01/25/2024 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-50024] (David Grant Crooks ) [Entered: 01/25/2024 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 01/26/2024 for Appellant Teresa Esparza [24-50024] (TNM) [Entered: 01/11/2024 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Teresa Esparza [24-50024] (TNM) [Entered: 01/10/2024 04:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Esparza v. Advanced Network | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teresa Esparza | |
| Represented By: | Kirk Cooper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Advanced Network Management, Incorporated, doing business as ANM, doing business as Network Management, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Rudd |
| Represented By: | David Grant Crooks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
