Raymond v. Flagstar Bank
| Carlos Antonio Raymond |
| Flagstar Bank, M. Samuel Daffin, II, In their official capacity as trustee of assets, Mary A. Daffin, In their official capacity as trustee of assets, Brian S. Engel, In their official capacity as trustee of assets, James C. Frappier, In their official capacity as trustee of assets, Robert F. Frappier, In their official capacity as trustee of assets, Steve Turner, In their official capacity as trustee of assets and Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner, Engle, L.L.P., In their official capacity as trustee of assets |
| 24-50116 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/29/2024 for Appellant Carlos Antonio Raymond. [24-50116] (DDL) [Entered: 03/20/2024 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 21 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-50116] (DDL) [Entered: 03/20/2024 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Shelley Luan Hopkins for Appellee Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner, Engle, L.L.P. in 24-50116, Attorney Shelley Luan Hopkins for Appellee Steve Turner in 24-50116, Attorney Shelley Luan Hopkins for Appellee Robert F. Frappier in 24-50116, Attorney Shelley Luan Hopkins for Appellee James C. Frappier in 24-50116, Attorney Shelley Luan Hopkins for Appellee Brian S. Engel in 24-50116, Attorney Shelley Luan Hopkins for Appellee Mary A. Daffin in 24-50116, Attorney Shelley Luan Hopkins for Appellee M. Samuel Daffin II in 24-50116 [24-50116] (RSM) [Entered: 03/05/2024 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mark D. Hopkins for party(s) Appellee Robert F. Frappier Appellee M. Samuel Daffin II Appellee Mary A. Daffin Appellee Brian S. Engel Appellee James C. Frappier Appellee Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner, Engle, L.L.P. Appellee Steve Turner, in case 24-50116 [24-50116] (RSM) [Entered: 03/05/2024 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Shelley Luan Hopkins for Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner, Engle, L.L.P., Mr. M. Samuel Daffin, II, Ms. Mary A. Daffin, Mr. Brian S. Engel, Mr. James C. Frappier, Mr. Robert F. Frappier and Mr. Steve Turner for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-50116] (Shelley Luan Hopkins ) [Entered: 03/04/2024 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-50116] (Mark D. Hopkins ) [Entered: 03/04/2024 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-1439. Electronic ROA due on 03/18/2024. [24-50116] (JJF) [Entered: 03/01/2024 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 11 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [11] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-50116] (JJF) [Entered: 03/01/2024 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 9 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Carlos Antonio Raymond. Fee deadline satisfied [24-50116] (JJF) [Entered: 02/28/2024 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 6 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [6] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Carlos Antonio Raymond. [6] [24-50116] (JJF) [Entered: 02/28/2024 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 03/11/2024 for Appellant Carlos Antonio Raymond [24-50116] (AMD) [Entered: 02/23/2024 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Carlos Antonio Raymond [24-50116] (AMD) [Entered: 02/21/2024 08:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
