Goerz v. Kendall
Hans Goerz |
Frank Kendall, III, Secretary, U.S. Department Of The Air Force |
24-50383 |
May 16, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:23-CV-51. Electronic ROA due on 06/03/2024. [24-50383] (JJF) [Entered: 05/17/2024 04:25 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-50383] (JJF) [Entered: 05/17/2024 04:20 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Hans Goerz [24-50383] (JJF) [Entered: 05/16/2024 04:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Goerz v. Kendall | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hans Goerz | |
Represented By: | Hans Goerz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Frank Kendall, III, Secretary, U.S. Department Of The Air Force | |
Represented By: | Cassius R.P. Borel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.