Rodney Reed
Petitioner: In re: Rodney Reed
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 24-50529
Filed: June 28, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2024 Filing 20 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Travis Golden Bragg for party(s) Respondent Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 24-50529 [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 07/01/2024 10:48 AM]
July 1, 2024 Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Parker Andrew Rider-Longmaid for Movant Rodney Reed in 24-50529 [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 07/01/2024 10:47 AM]
July 1, 2024 Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jeremy Patashnik for Movant Rodney Reed in 24-50529 [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 07/01/2024 10:46 AM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jeremy Patashnik for Mr. Rodney Reed for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-50529] (Jeremy Patashnik ) [Entered: 06/28/2024 05:32 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Parker Andrew Rider-Longmaid for Mr. Rodney Reed for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-50529] (Parker Andrew Rider-Longmaid ) [Entered: 06/28/2024 05:28 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-50529] (Travis Golden Bragg ) [Entered: 06/28/2024 04:08 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 7 CASE CAPTION updated. Respondent Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division added to case. Reason: to file a response. [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 06/28/2024 03:24 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 5 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 06/28/2024 03:07 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 4 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to file successive petition [ # 2 ] filed by Movant Mr. Rodney Reed [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 06/28/2024 03:05 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 3 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to file successive petition [ # 2 ] filed by Movant Mr. Rodney Reed [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 06/28/2024 03:04 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION filed by Movant Mr. Rodney Reed for authorization to file successive petition 2254 petition[2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/28/2024.. [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 06/28/2024 02:59 PM]
June 28, 2024 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [24-50529] (MRW) [Entered: 06/28/2024 02:58 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rodney Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: Rodney Reed
Represented By: Parker Andrew Rider-Longmaid
Represented By: Cliff C. Gardner Esq.
Represented By: George H. Kendall
Represented By: Andrew Fairles MacRae
Represented By: Jeremy Patashnik
Represented By: Jane Pucher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Travis Golden Bragg
Represented By: Matthew Dennis Ottoway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?