Spinks v. Linthicum
| Nancy Jackson Spinks |
| John or Jane Doe, N.P. at UTMB with Hilltop Unit Infirary, Andrea Lozada, Senior Warden for TDCJ Mountainview/Hilltop Complex, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Office of the Attorney General (Texas), Kimberly Garza, Senior Warden CID, Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae, FNU Tatum, Assistant Warden, John or Jane Doe, Executive Director of Clinical Services for UTMB, John or Jane Doe, Executive Medical Director of Facility Operations for UTMB, Yvonne Gasigwa, Ann Best and Lannette Linthicum |
| 24-50965 |
| December 6, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:24-CV-408. Electronic ROA due on 02/05/2025. [24-50965] (CAG) [Entered: 01/21/2025 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 03/03/2025 for Appellant Nancy Jackson Spinks. [24-50965] (CAG) [Entered: 01/21/2025 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 01/06/2025 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Ms. Nancy Jackson Spinks. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [24-50965] (CAG) [Entered: 01/21/2025 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [24-50965] (EMF) [Entered: 12/10/2024 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Nancy Jackson Spinks [24-50965] (EMF) [Entered: 12/06/2024 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.