National Automobile Assoc v. FTC
National Automobile Dealers Association and Texas Automobile Dealers Association |
Federal Trade Commission |
24-60013 |
January 5, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Attorneys Matthew Hoffman and Benjamin Aiken added as counsel of record for Respondent FTC in 24-60013 [24-60013] (AGL) [Entered: 01/08/2024 04:36 PM] |
Filing 7 OPPOSED MOTION filed by Petitioners National Automobile Dealers Association and Texas Automobile Dealers Association for stay pending appeal [7] Ruling is requested by: 04/01/2024, to expedite the appeal [7]. Date of service: 01/08/2024 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Abbott, Clark, Hippsley, Simons; Attorney for Petitioner: Harris [24-60013] (Jeffrey Matthew Harris ) [Entered: 01/08/2024 04:04 PM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-60013] (Jeffrey Matthew Harris ) [Entered: 01/08/2024 03:42 PM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60013] (Matthew Michael Hoffman ) [Entered: 01/08/2024 11:05 AM] |
Filing 4 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [4] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-60013] (AGL) [Entered: 01/08/2024 10:39 AM] |
Filing 1 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners National Automobile Dealers Association and Texas Automobile Dealers Association. Date received in 5th Circuit: 01/04/2024. Administrative Record due on 02/14/2024. [24-60013] (SEP) [Entered: 01/05/2024 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.