Lincoln Dille, IIIn re: Lincoln Dille, II
| In re: Lincoln Dille, II |
| 24-60073 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [24-60073] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2024 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 2 ] filed by Petitioner Mr. Lincoln Dille, II [24-60073] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2024 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Lincoln Dille, II for writ of mandamus [2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 02/12/2024. Fee due on 03/15/2024 for Petitioner Lincoln Dille II. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 03/15/2024 for Petitioner Lincoln Dille II. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: need certificate of service [24-60073] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2024 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [24-60073] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2024 03:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lincoln Dille, IIIn re: Lincoln Dille, II | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Lincoln Dille, II | |
| Represented By: | Lincoln Dille II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
