Gomez v. Garland
| Pedro Gomez |
| Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General |
| 24-60174 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Pedro Gomez. Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/05/2024. Immigration File Number: a070 004 189 Fee due on 04/25/2024 for Petitioner Pedro Gomez. Copy of BIA order due on 04/25/2024 for Petitioner Pedro Gomez. Administrative Record due on 05/20/2024 [24-60174] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/10/2024 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gomez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Pedro Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Pedro Gomez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
