In re: Electronic Security Association
| NCTA-The Internet & Television Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau and In re: Electronic Security Association |
| Federal Trade Commission |
| 24-60570 |
| November 5, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 37 COURT ORDER granting Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 2 ]; denying motion for an administrative stay, filed by Petitioners NCTA-The Internet & Television Association, Electronic Security Association and Interactive Advertising Bureau [ # 2 ]. [24-60570] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/19/2024 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 33 RESPONSE filed by Petitioners Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association to the 28j Letter filed by Respondent FTC [ # 29 ] Date of Service: 11/15/2024 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Aiken, Dasgupta, Hoffman; Attorney for Petitioners: Corcoran, Ho, Hubbard, Mui, Richman, Townsend, Walker, Weinberger [24-60570] (Helgi C. Walker ) [Entered: 11/15/2024 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 30 REPLY filed by Petitioners Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association [30] to the Response/Opposition filed by Respondent FTC [ # 24 ]. Date of Service: 11/14/2024 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Aiken, Dasgupta, Hoffman; Attorney for Petitioners: Corcoran, Ho, Hubbard, Mui, Richman, Townsend, Walker, Weinberger. [24-60570] (Helgi C. Walker ) [Entered: 11/14/2024 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 29 SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES (FRAP 28j) FILED by Respondent FTC Date of Service: 11/14/2024 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Aiken, Dasgupta, Hoffman; Attorney for Petitioners: Corcoran, Ho, Hubbard, Mui, Richman, Townsend, Walker, Weinberger [24-60570] (Benjamin Aiken ) [Entered: 11/14/2024 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 27 COURT DIRECTIVE ISSUED requesting that the petitioner be directed to file a reply to the Response/Opposition [ # 24 ] filed by Respondent FTC in 24-60570. Reply due 11/15/2024 at 12:00 pm. Reply deadline to response updated to 11/15/2024. [24-60570] (PAC) [Entered: 11/13/2024 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by FTC [24] to the Petition filed by Petitioners Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association [ # 2 ], Petition filed by Petitioners Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association [ # 2 ] Date of Service: 11/12/2024 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Aiken, Dasgupta, Hoffman; Attorney for Petitioners: Corcoran, Ho, Hubbard, Mui, Richman, Townsend, Walker, Weinberger. [24-60570] (Benjamin Aiken ) [Entered: 11/12/2024 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Benjamin Aiken for party(s) Respondent FTC, in case 24-60570 [24-60570] (AMD) [Entered: 11/11/2024 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Benjamin Aiken ) [Entered: 11/11/2024 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Michael Hoffman, Allyson Newton Ho, Michael Corcoran, Bradley G. Hubbard, Connor Philip Mui, Brian Alan Richman, Lucas C. Townsend, Lael Weinberger for party(s) Respondent FTC Petitioner Electronic Security Association Petitioner Interactive Advertising Bureau Petitioner NCTA-The Internet & Television Association, in case 24-60570 [24-60570] (ABT) [Entered: 11/06/2024 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 16 COURT DIRECTIVE ISSUED requesting a response to the Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners NCTA-The Internet & Television Association, Electronic Security Association and Interactive Advertising Bureau in 24-60570 [ # 2 ] Response/Opposition due on 11/12/2024 by 5:00 p.m. [24-60570] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Lael Weinberger ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Lucas C. Townsend ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Brian Alan Richman ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Connor Philip Mui ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Bradley G. Hubbard ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Allyson Newton Ho ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-60570] (Michael Corcoran ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-60570] (Matthew Michael Hoffman ) [Entered: 11/06/2024 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [24-60570] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/05/2024 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus and stay order of the Commission's Rule [ # 2 ],[ # 2 ] filed by Petitioners Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association Date of Service: 11/05/2024 [24-60570] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/05/2024 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioners Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association for writ of mandamus [2] Ruling is requested by: 11/19/2024 Date received in 5th Circuit: 11/05/2024., to stay order of the Commission's Rule dated 10/16/2024 [2]. [24-60570] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/05/2024 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [24-60570] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/05/2024 04:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.