USA v. Young
| United States of America |
| Ronald Scott Young |
| 25-10200 |
| January 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:09-CR-138-1. Electronic ROA due on 03/28/2025. [25-10200] (EMF) [Entered: 03/13/2025 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Saenz Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [25-10200] (EMF) [Entered: 03/13/2025 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellant Mr. Ronald Scott Young is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [25-10200] (Debbie Saenz ) [Entered: 03/12/2025 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Saenz, Est. Completion Dt: 03/18/2025, Est. No.of Pgs: 40, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 02/18/2025, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 03/18/2025, Proceeding Type and Date: Revocation Hearing 01/07/2025. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 03/18/2025 for Debbie Saenz, Court Reporter [25-10200] (PAC) [Entered: 02/19/2025 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 10 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Ms. Debbie Saenz. [25-10200] (Debbie Saenz ) [Entered: 02/15/2025 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Ronald Scott Young. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Saenz, Proceeding Type and Date: Revocation Hearing 01/07/2025. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 02/14/2025 for Debbie Saenz, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 8 ] [25-10200] (PAC) [Entered: 02/04/2025 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Scott Youngfor the Court to process. Date of service: 01/31/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gilstrap; Attorney for Appellant: Vega. [25-10200] (Maria Gabriela Vega ) [Entered: 01/31/2025 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Maria Gabriela Vega for Appellant Ronald Scott Young in 25-10200 [25-10200] (STH) [Entered: 01/17/2025 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Maria Gabriela Vega for Mr. Ronald Scott Young for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-10200] (Maria Gabriela Vega ) [Entered: 01/16/2025 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 01/31/2025 for Appellant Ronald Scott Young [25-10200] (LEF) [Entered: 01/16/2025 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Scott Young [25-10200] (LEF) [Entered: 01/16/2025 03:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Young | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Stephen S. Gilstrap |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ronald Scott Young | |
| Represented By: | Maria Gabriela Vega |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
