Blacks in Technology v. Beasley
Counter-Defendant: Blacks in Technology, L.L.C., Gregory Greenlee and Dennis Schulz
Counter-Claimant: Peter Beasley
Case Number: 25-10224
Filed: January 23, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Liability

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 11, 2025 Blacks in Technology v. Beasley

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2025 Filing 33 COURT ORDER granting Motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 25 ]; rescinding order ruling on Motion to place District Court Docket Entry 340, Exh. B under seal filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 17 ]; granting Motion to place District Court Docket Entry 340, Exhibit A under seal filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 17 ]; granting Motion for expedited ruling on motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 25 ] [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 03/10/2025 03:26 PM]
March 5, 2025 Filing 25 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley for reconsideration of the 02/28/2025 court order granting Motion to place material under seal filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley in 25-10224 [ # 17 ] [25], for expedited ruling on motion for reconsideration. [25]. [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 03/10/2025 08:58 AM]
February 28, 2025 Filing 26 CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellees Blacks in Technology, L.L.C., Gregory Greenlee and Dennis Schulz in 25-10224. Reason: not appellees to appeal. [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 03/10/2025 09:04 AM]
February 28, 2025 Filing 24 COURT ORDER granting Motion to amend caption filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 18 ]; granting Motion to place material under seal filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 17 ]; granting Motion for expedited ruling on motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 17 ]; denying Motion for extraordinary relief filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 17 ] [25-10224] (CAS) [Entered: 02/28/2025 01:43 PM]
February 19, 2025 Filing 16 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/31/2025 for Appellant Peter Beasley. [25-10224] (DDL) [Entered: 02/19/2025 09:05 AM]
February 19, 2025 Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-10224] (DDL) [Entered: 02/19/2025 09:04 AM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 19 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to place DE 340 under seal [ # 17 ], Motion for expedited ruling on motion [ # 17 ], Motion to temporarily place DE 340 under seal. [ # 17 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 02/26/2025 04:02 PM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 18 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley to amend caption [18]. [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 02/26/2025 03:56 PM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley to place District Court Docket Entry 340 (Exhibit B) under seal [17], for expedited ruling [17],or, alternatively, to temporarily place DE 340 (Ex. B) under seal. [17]. [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 02/26/2025 03:51 PM]
February 6, 2025 Filing 14 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 02/18/2025 09:09 AM]
January 30, 2025 Filing 13 CLERK ORDER denying Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [ # 9 ] [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 01/30/2025 08:00 AM]
January 28, 2025 Filing 8 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [8] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-10224] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/28/2025 11:06 AM]
January 27, 2025 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-3008. Electronic ROA due on 02/11/2025. [25-10224] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/27/2025 04:16 PM]
January 24, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9]. [25-10224] (MFY) [Entered: 01/29/2025 03:30 PM]
January 23, 2025 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Beasley [25-10224] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/23/2025 11:01 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Blacks in Technology v. Beasley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-defendant: Blacks in Technology, L.L.C.
Represented By: Colin Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-defendant: Gregory Greenlee
Represented By: Colin Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-defendant: Dennis Schulz
Represented By: Colin Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-claimant: Peter Beasley
Represented By: Peter Beasley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?