In re: Chris Money
| In re: Chris Lewis Money |
| 25-10249 |
| January 31, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 The Motion to file successive petition filed by Movant Mr. Chris Lewis Money in 25-10249 [ # 2 ] has been made sufficient. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Rpl deadline satisfied. [25-10249] (MBC) [Entered: 03/07/2025 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [25-10249] (CAG) [Entered: 01/31/2025 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 Sufficient Motion for Certificate of Appealability treated as MOTION filed by Movant Mr. Chris Lewis Money for authorization to file successive petition 2254 petition[2]. Date received in 5th Circuit: 01/27/2025. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: requires proposed petition. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 03/03/2025 for Movant Chris Lewis Money. [25-10249] (CAG) [Entered: 01/31/2025 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [25-10249] (CAG) [Entered: 01/31/2025 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Chris Money | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Chris Lewis Money | |
| Represented By: | Chris Lewis Money |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
