Montemayor v. Tom Green County Jail
| Steve Montemayor |
| Tom Green County Jail, Levi Vance, Tom Green County Jail, Roland Galindo, Sheriff Deputy, Debbie Liles, Tom Green County jail, Tom Hodges Brown, Jeff Washington, Gilbert Chapoy, Beverely LNU, Tom Green County Jail, FNU Taylor, Corp. Tom Green County Jail, FNU Montevalles, Guard Tom Green County Jail, FNU Ramos, Guard Tom Green County Jail, Steve Henshaw Paxton and Rhonda LNU, Guard Tom Green County Jail |
| 25-10295 |
| February 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [11] [25-10295] (CAG) [Entered: 04/07/2025 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 8 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [25-10295] (EMF) [Entered: 03/11/2025 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 7 3 STRIKES case. [25-10295] (EMF) [Entered: 03/11/2025 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 10 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the forms received from Appellant Mr. Steve Montemayor because they are unnecessary [25-10295] (LEF) [Entered: 03/11/2025 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 04/14/2025 for Appellant Steve Montemayor [25-10295] (EMF) [Entered: 02/18/2025 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Steve Montemayor [25-10295] (EMF) [Entered: 02/14/2025 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
