Stephens v. Tarrant County
Plaintiff: Antoine Demone Stephens
Defendant: Tarrant County District Attorney Office, Sharon Wilson and Officer Dawley
Case Number: 25-10342
Filed: March 3, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 16, 2025 Stephens v. Tarrant County

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2025 Filing 12 BRIEFING COMPLETE. [25-10342] (CAG) [Entered: 04/21/2025 01:34 PM]
April 9, 2025 Filing 11 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for IFP and financial affidavit received from Appellant Mr. Antoine Demone Stephens because appellant is already proceeding IFP on appeal [25-10342] (CAG) [Entered: 04/21/2025 01:32 PM]
April 9, 2025 Filing 10 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Antoine Demone Stephens. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [25-10342] (CAG) [Entered: 04/21/2025 01:30 PM]
April 2, 2025 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-10342] (DDL) [Entered: 04/02/2025 01:03 PM]
March 14, 2025 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:25-CV-68. Electronic ROA due on 03/31/2025. [25-10342] (RSM) [Entered: 03/14/2025 01:16 PM]
March 14, 2025 Filing 7 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 04/23/2025 for Appellant Antoine Demone Stephens. [25-10342] (RSM) [Entered: 03/14/2025 01:14 PM]
March 14, 2025 Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-10342] (RSM) [Entered: 03/14/2025 01:11 PM]
March 14, 2025 Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/03/2025 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Antoine Demone Stephens. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [25-10342] (RSM) [Entered: 03/14/2025 01:10 PM]
March 3, 2025 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Antoine Demone Stephens [25-10342] (CAG) [Entered: 03/03/2025 11:31 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephens v. Tarrant County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antoine Demone Stephens
Represented By: Antoine Demone Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tarrant County District Attorney Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Dawley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?