USA v. Lee
| United States of America |
| Timothy Stephen Lee |
| 25-10443 |
| March 27, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 Paper copies of Appellant Reply Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee in 25-10443 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. [25-10443] (KMP) [Entered: 08/13/2025 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 25 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED Reply Brief deadline satisfied [25-10443] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee. Date of service: 07/31/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Gilstrap, Myatt; Attorney for Appellant: Robinson [25-10443] (Matthew McGavock Robinson ) [Entered: 07/31/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 24 APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 07/31/2025 for Appellant Timothy Stephen Lee [25-10443] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by USA. Date of service: 07/10/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Gilstrap, Myatt; Attorney for Appellant: Robinson [25-10443] (Matthew Myatt ) [Entered: 07/10/2025 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 23 Paper copies of Record Excerpts filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee in 25-10443 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 4. [25-10443] (CBW) [Entered: 06/27/2025 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 22 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellee USA. Extension Granted to and including 07/10/2025. Reason: No Opposition Stated. E/Res's Brief deadline updated to 07/10/2025 for Appellee United States of America [25-10443] (RLJ) [Entered: 06/27/2025 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 21 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellee USA for filing appellee's brief until 07/10/2025 [25-10443] (Matthew Myatt ) [Entered: 06/26/2025 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 20 Paper copies of Appellant Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee in 25-10443 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. [25-10443] (KMP) [Entered: 06/12/2025 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Myatt for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 25-10443 [25-10443] (PAC) [Entered: 06/06/2025 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-10443] (Matthew Myatt ) [Entered: 06/05/2025 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 16 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee [ # 14 ] Date of service: 05/29/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gilstrap; Attorney for Appellant: Robinson [25-10443] (Matthew McGavock Robinson ) [Entered: 05/29/2025 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 15 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee in 25-10443 [ # 14 ] Record Excerpts have been deemed insufficient. Corrections required: Records must have blank sheets titled Tab1 - etc. between each section.. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline updated to 06/11/2025 for Appellant Timothy Stephen Lee [25-10443] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee [ # 14 ] Date of service: 05/28/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gilstrap; Attorney for Appellant: Robinson [25-10443] (Matthew McGavock Robinson ) [Entered: 05/28/2025 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 14 SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [25-10443] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require all of the documents listed in the table of contents. The filed excerpts only contain a cover page and table of contents.. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 06/10/2025 for Appellant Timothy Stephen Lee [25-10443] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee. Date of service: 05/27/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gilstrap; Attorney for Appellant: Robinson [25-10443] (Matthew McGavock Robinson ) [Entered: 05/27/2025 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 13 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 06/10/2025 for Appellant Timothy Stephen Lee. Appellee's Brief due on 06/26/2025 for Appellee United States of America [25-10443] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee. Date of service: 05/27/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gilstrap; Attorney for Appellant: Robinson [25-10443] (Matthew McGavock Robinson ) [Entered: 05/27/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/27/2025 for Appellant Timothy Stephen Lee. [25-10443] (DDL) [Entered: 04/14/2025 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-10443] (DDL) [Entered: 04/14/2025 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 10 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [10] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-10443] (JJF) [Entered: 04/09/2025 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:10-CR-144-1. Electronic ROA due on 04/16/2025. [25-10443] (RLJ) [Entered: 04/01/2025 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew McGavock Robinson for Appellant Timothy Stephen Lee in 25-10443 [25-10443] (RLJ) [Entered: 04/01/2025 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [25-10443] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 03/31/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gilstrap; Attorney for Appellant: Robinson [25-10443] (Matthew McGavock Robinson ) [Entered: 03/31/2025 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Matthew McGavock Robinson, Esq. for Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-10443] (Matthew McGavock Robinson ) [Entered: 03/31/2025 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Stephen Lee [25-10443] (JJF) [Entered: 03/27/2025 12:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Lee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Stephen S. Gilstrap |
| Represented By: | Matthew Myatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Timothy Stephen Lee | |
| Represented By: | Matthew McGavock Robinson Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
