Copeland v. Nevarez
| Kathryn Copeland |
| Judge Jesus Nevarez, Jr., in his individual capacity |
| 25-10498 |
| April 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 46 COURT ORDER carrying with the case Motion to place motion under seal filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland [ # 30 ]; carrying with the case Motion to place material under seal filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland [ # 30 ]; carrying with the case Motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland [ # 17 ]; remanding case to the District Court for ruling on IFP. The appeal is HELD IN ABEYANCE, and this matter is REMANDED to permit the district court to rule on a motion to proceed IFP on appeal. Once the district court has ruled on that motion, the clerk of the district court shall supplement the record on appeal, and the case shall be returned to this court. This court retains jurisdiction of the appeal, and the motions for appointment of counsel and to seal are carried with the case. [25-10498] (RSM) [Entered: 09/19/2025 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 35 BRIEFING COMPLETE. [25-10498] (RSM) [Entered: 08/19/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 34 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland in 25-10498 [ # 16 ] Brief has been deemed sufficient. Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied [25-10498] (RSM) [Entered: 08/19/2025 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 30 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland to place motion under seal [30], to place Memo in supoprt filed 7/23/25 under seal [30]. [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 08/01/2025 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 27 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland in support of the Motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland in 25-10498 [ # 17 ], Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland in 25-10498 [ # 12 ].. Affidavit deadline satisfied. [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 07/29/2025 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 21 MEMO IN SUPPORT of Motion to appoint counsel [ # 17 ] filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 07/28/2025 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland to appoint counsel [17]. Date of service: 07/21/2025 [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 07/23/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 16 SUFFICIENT APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Kathryn Copeland. Additionally the Brief requires INSUFFICIENT FOR: BRIEF IS NOT IN CORRECT FORMAT (DISTRICT COURT TEMPLATE USED); MISSING CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES, TABLE OF CONTENTS, TABLE OF AUTHORITIES, STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION, STATEMENT OF ISSUES, STATEMENT OF CASE, ARGUMENT. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 07/25/2025 for Appellant Kathryn Copeland. [25-10498] (RSM) [Entered: 07/11/2025 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 15 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/08/2025 for Appellant Kathryn Copeland. [25-10498] (DDL) [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-10498] (DDL) [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:25-CV-137. Electronic ROA due on 06/04/2025. [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 05/20/2025 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland to proceed in forma pauperis [12] Fee deadline canceled. [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 05/20/2025 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 11 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/09/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland. [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 05/20/2025 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 10 CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Kathryn Copeland in 25-10498. Update: Letter received this date. [25-10498] (MBC) [Entered: 05/20/2025 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [25-10498] (MFY) [Entered: 05/08/2025 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 Attorney John Allen Douglas added as counsel of record for Appellant Kathryn Copeland in 25-10498 [25-10498] (MFY) [Entered: 05/08/2025 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. John Allen Douglas is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:incorrect attorney/does not appear in system. [25-10498] (MFY) [Entered: 05/08/2025 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 05/01/2025 for Appellant Kathryn Copeland [25-10498] (RSM) [Entered: 04/16/2025 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Copeland [25-10498] (MFY) [Entered: 04/09/2025 12:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Copeland v. Nevarez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kathryn Copeland | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Copeland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Judge Jesus Nevarez, Jr., in his individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
