Amaru v. Rhome Police
Plaintiff: Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru and Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru
Defendant: Rhome Police Department, Mark Moore, Other Associates, City of Rhome, Eric Debus, M. Martinez, Badge #836 and Marissa Martinez
Case Number: 25-10560
Filed: April 29, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2025 Filing 36 COURT ORDER denying Motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru [ # 28 ], denying Motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru [ # 27 ] [25-10560] (LEF) [Entered: 10/24/2025 04:13 PM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 28 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru for reconsideration of the 10/17/2025 clerk order denying Motion to reopen case filed by Appellants Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru and Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru in 25-10560 [ # 21 ] [28]. Date of service: 10/17/2025 [25-10560] (LEF) [Entered: 10/24/2025 12:54 PM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 27 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru for reconsideration of the 10/17/2025 clerk order denying Motion to reopen case filed by Appellants Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru and Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru in 25-10560 [ # 21 ] [27]. Date of service: 10/17/2025 [25-10560] (LEF) [Entered: 10/24/2025 12:52 PM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 26 CLERK ORDER denying Motion to reopen case filed by Appellants Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru and Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru [ # 21 ] [25-10560] (LEF) [Entered: 10/17/2025 08:07 AM]
October 6, 2025 Filing 22 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to reopen, copy of notice of appeal, and transcript order form received from Appellants Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru and Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru because a motion to reopen the case is filed but the deficiency has not been remedied. Both appellants must sign the Notice of Appeal. [25-10560] (LEF) [Entered: 10/15/2025 01:15 PM]
September 4, 2025 Filing 21 MOTION filed by Appellants Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru and Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru to reopen case [21] Default has NOT been remedied. Date of service: 09/04/2025 [25-10560] (LEF) [Entered: 09/10/2025 03:26 PM]
June 10, 2025 Filing 19 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notice of 05/02/2025 [25-10560] (LEF) [Entered: 06/10/2025 03:38 PM]
May 6, 2025 Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Alyssa M. Barreneche for party(s) Appellee Marissa Martinez, in case 25-10560 [25-10560] (EMF) [Entered: 05/06/2025 01:43 PM]
May 6, 2025 Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David Randall Montgomery for Appellee Marissa Martinez in 25-10560 [25-10560] (EMF) [Entered: 05/06/2025 01:40 PM]
May 6, 2025 Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) John David Husted for party(s) Appellee City of Rhome Appellee Eric Debus Appellee Mark Moore, in case 25-10560 [25-10560] (EMF) [Entered: 05/06/2025 01:39 PM]
May 6, 2025 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Thomas Phillip Brandt for Appellee Eric Debus in 25-10560 [25-10560] (EMF) [Entered: 05/06/2025 01:35 PM]
May 5, 2025 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-10560] (Alyssa M. Barreneche ) [Entered: 05/05/2025 12:42 PM]
May 5, 2025 Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-10560] (David Randall Montgomery ) [Entered: 05/05/2025 12:37 PM]
May 5, 2025 Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-10560] (John David Husted ) [Entered: 05/05/2025 10:11 AM]
May 5, 2025 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Thomas Phillip Brandt for City of Rhome, Mr. Eric Debus and Mr. Mark Moore for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-10560] (Thomas Phillip Brandt ) [Entered: 05/05/2025 10:09 AM]
May 2, 2025 Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 06/02/2025 for Appellants Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru and Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru, for signed NOA [25-10560] (RSM) [Entered: 05/02/2025 12:01 PM]
April 29, 2025 Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [4] NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru and Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru. [4] [25-10560] (CAS) [Entered: 04/29/2025 10:50 AM]
April 29, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru and Mr. Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru [25-10560] (CAS) [Entered: 04/29/2025 09:49 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Amaru v. Rhome Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru
Represented By: Qukulkhan Shabaz NagaQiX Amaru
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru
Represented By: Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rhome Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Moore
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Brandt
Represented By: John David Husted
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Other Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Rhome
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Brandt
Represented By: John David Husted
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Debus
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Brandt
Represented By: John David Husted
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Martinez, Badge #836
Represented By: David Randall Montgomery Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marissa Martinez
Represented By: David Randall Montgomery Esq.
Represented By: Alyssa M. Barreneche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?