Grizzle v. Texas Tech
| Robert Grizzle |
| Texas Tech Medical Branch, Bryan Williams, warden, Jim Webb, warden, Jessica Rojas, nurse, Terri Rose, doctor, Emily Hamilton, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3, FNU Figirova, FNU Salina, Lucinda Cortez, Michael Miller, Cody Parker, Richard Aimes, Ricardo Perez, Joanne Castro, FNU Wells and Kofi Antwi Stephenson |
| 25-10809 |
| July 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 12/31/2025 for Appellant Robert Grizzle [25-10809] (CAS) [Entered: 12/16/2025 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/24/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Robert Grizzle. Fee due on 12/10/2025 for Appellant Robert Grizzle [25-10809] (RLJ) [Entered: 11/10/2025 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Robert Grizzle. Fee deadline satisfied. [25-10809] (PAC) [Entered: 09/12/2025 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 09/04/2025 for Appellant Robert Grizzle [25-10809] (RLJ) [Entered: 07/11/2025 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Grizzle [25-10809] (RLJ) [Entered: 07/03/2025 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.