Fleming v. Rule
| Rhonda Fleming |
| Tyal Rule, Warden, Carswell FMC |
| 25-11101 |
| September 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [24] [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 01/28/2026 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 22 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 01/22/2026 for Appellant Rhonda Fleming [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 01/07/2026 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 20 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming [ # 16 ] Fee deadline updated to 12/29/2025 for Appellant Rhonda Fleming [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 12/04/2025 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming to extend time to pay filing fee until 12/29/2025 [16]. Date of service: 11/21/2025 [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 12/04/2025 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 15 LETTER filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming: address change. [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 12/04/2025 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming in support of the Motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming in 25-11101 [ # 8 ]. Affidavit is insufficient for the following reasons: Not Signed. PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Affidavit deadline satisfied. [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 12/04/2025 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 12 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming [ # 6 ] Fee deadline updated to 11/28/2025 for Appellant Rhonda Fleming [25-11101] (PAC) [Entered: 11/07/2025 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 9 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to appoint counsel [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming Date of Service: 10/28/2025 [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 11/06/2025 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming to appoint counsel [8] Affidavit due on 11/28/2025 for Appellant Rhonda Fleming. Date of service: 10/28/2025 [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 11/06/2025 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming to extend time to pay filing fee [6]. Date of service: 10/28/2025 [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 11/06/2025 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 10/27/2025 for Appellant Rhonda Fleming [25-11101] (CAS) [Entered: 10/10/2025 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Rhonda Fleming [25-11101] (JJF) [Entered: 09/29/2025 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fleming v. Rule | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rhonda Fleming | |
| Represented By: | Rhonda Fleming |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Tyal Rule, Warden, Carswell FMC | |
| Represented By: | Ann Elizabeth Cruce-Haag |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.