Giaccio v. Davis
Plaintiff: Huong Gilmer Giaccio
Defendant: Ray Davis, Tim Rough and Hector Romero
Case Number: 25-11107
Filed: October 2, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 6, 2026 Giaccio v. Davis

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate issue date satisfied. [25-11107] (CAS) [Entered: 03/27/2026 11:14 AM]
March 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 81 COURT ORDER denying Petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [ # 76 ] Mandate issue date is 03/27/2026 [25-11107] (SR) [Entered: 03/20/2026 10:55 AM]
March 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 80 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion received from Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio because the court has rendered its decision in this case and a petition for rehearing is currently pending. [25-11107] (RLJ) [Entered: 03/17/2026 12:36 PM]
March 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 76 PETITION for rehearing [76] Mandate issue date canceled.. Date of Service: 03/07/2026 [25-11107] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio for rehearing [76]. Date of service: 03/07/2026 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 03/07/2026 02:04 PM]
March 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 74 JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. [25-11107] (RLJ) [Entered: 03/06/2026 11:03 AM]
March 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 73 UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [25-11107 Dismissed ] Judge: LHS, Judge: SKD, Judge: KDE. Mandate issue date is 03/27/2026; dismissing appeal as frivolous [73]; denying Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [ # 34 ]; denying Motion for judicial notice filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [ # 51 ]; denying Motion to supplement the record on appeal filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [ # 62 ] [25-11107] (RLJ) [Entered: 03/06/2026 11:01 AM]
February 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 62 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio to supplement the record on appeal with TDLR status letters dated February 19, 2026 and accompanying Notice of Ongoing State Agency Investigation. Informational only; no relief requested. [62]. Date of service: 02/23/2026 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:55 PM]
January 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 56 BRIEFING COMPLETE. [25-11107] (CAG) [Entered: 01/23/2026 02:55 PM]
January 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 55 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - REMOVED FROM THE DOCKET. The proposed sufficient record excerpts received from Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio was incorrectly filed as a motion. The incorrect docketing event has been removed from the docket. Appellant is WARNED that repeated misfilings will be considered an abuse of electronic filing privileges, which can be revoked. [25-11107] (CAG) [Entered: 01/23/2026 02:38 PM]
January 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 54 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio in 25-11107 [ # 49 ]. Record Excerpts have been deemed sufficient. Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [25-11107] (CAG) [Entered: 01/23/2026 02:27 PM]
December 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MOTION for judicial notice [51]. [25-11107] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio for leave to file supplemental document [51]. Date of service: 12/30/2025 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 12/30/2025 04:23 PM]
December 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 52 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appellant's brief received from Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio because it is a duplicate document [25-11107] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/09/2026 09:01 AM]
December 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 49 SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. [25-11107] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require removal of exhibits not in ROA, photos, transcripts; addition of judgment, docket sheet, any magistrate's report, & blank pages w/numbered tabs; caption must exactly match 5th; Circuit caption; no arguments or summaries can be made in record excerpts;. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 01/12/2026 for Appellant Huong Gilmer Giaccio [25-11107] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio for leave to file document [49]. Date of service: 12/28/2025 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 12/28/2025 01:45 PM]
December 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 48 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [25-11107] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio for leave to file brief instanter [48]. Date of service: 12/28/2025 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 12/28/2025 01:36 PM]
December 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 46 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/21/2026 for Appellant Huong Gilmer Giaccio. [25-11107] (DDL) [Entered: 12/12/2025 09:22 AM]
December 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-11107] (DDL) [Entered: 12/12/2025 09:22 AM]
December 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 43 COURT ORDER granting Motion to waive PACER fees filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [ # 26 ] [25-11107] (RLJ) [Entered: 12/04/2025 11:54 AM]
November 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 37 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio to waive fee [37]. Date of service: 11/24/2025 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 11/24/2025 06:49 PM]
November 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:24-CV-2469. Electronic ROA due on 12/03/2025. [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 11/18/2025 08:45 AM]
November 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis [34] Fee deadline canceled. [25-11107] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio to proceed IFP [34]. Date of service: 11/17/2025 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 11/17/2025 04:24 PM]
November 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 33 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/17/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio. Fee due on 12/17/2025 for Appellant Huong Gilmer Giaccio [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 11/17/2025 11:00 AM]
November 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 29 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to accept and file record excerpts received from Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio because filed in wrong case [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 11/14/2025 01:57 PM]
November 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 26 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio to waive fee [26]. Date of service: 11/12/2025 via email - Appellant Giaccio [25-11107] (Huong Gilmer Giaccio ) [Entered: 11/12/2025 09:41 PM]
November 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 24 COURT ORDER denying without prejudice Motion to waive Pacer fees filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [ # 14 ] [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 11/11/2025 08:31 AM]
November 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 25 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to request prompt ruling or clarification on pending motion to compel production and discovery received from Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio because should be filed with the district court [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 11/11/2025 11:28 AM]
October 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 20 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the renewed motion to confirm electronic filing received from Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio because an order granting electronic filing in this case was issued on 10/9/2025 [25-11107] (CAS) [Entered: 10/28/2025 10:23 AM]
October 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Huong Gilmer Giaccio to waive Pacer fees [14]. Date of service: 10/22/2025 [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 10/24/2025 09:05 AM]
October 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to compel production and discovery received from Appellant Mr. Huong Gilmer Giaccio because Same document pending in district court. [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 10/21/2025 10:51 AM]
October 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Huong Gilmer Giaccio to the District Court for filing. [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 10/10/2025 12:50 PM]
October 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Huong Gilmer Giaccio. [25-11107] Sufficient IFP due in DC (MBC) [Entered: 10/10/2025 12:49 PM]
October 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [ # 6 ] [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 10/09/2025 03:43 PM]
October 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Huong Gilmer Giaccio for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [6]. Date of service: 10/08/2025 [25-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 10/09/2025 01:24 PM]
October 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-11107] (NMF) [Entered: 10/06/2025 02:04 PM]
October 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Huong Gilmer Giaccio [25-11107] (NMF) [Entered: 10/02/2025 08:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Giaccio v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Huong Gilmer Giaccio
Represented By: Huong Gilmer Giaccio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Rough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hector Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?