Hoard v. Texas Attorney General
| Robert Hoard, IV |
| Texas Attorney General, Tam Terry, Sheriff, Holly Jeffreys, Matt Metzner, Sterling Commissary, L.L.C. and Carson County Commissioners Court |
| 25-11230 |
| November 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file brief in support filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV [ # 20 ] Brief in Support deadline updated to 04/27/2026 for Appellant Robert Hoard IV. No further extensions. [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 04/09/2026 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV to extend time to file brief in support of IFP [20]. Date of service: 03/26/2026 [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 04/08/2026 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV for appointment of counsel [19]. Date of service: 03/26/2026 [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 04/08/2026 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 18 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file brief in support of IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV [ # 14 ] Brief in Support deadline updated to 03/26/2026 for Appellant Robert Hoard IV [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 03/06/2026 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV to extend time to file brief in support of IFP [14]. Date of service: 02/02/2026 [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 03/06/2026 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 13 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Brief in Support deadline updated to 02/24/2026 for Appellant Robert Hoard IV [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 02/09/2026 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-11230] (LEF) [Entered: 01/26/2026 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 12 MEMO IN SUPPORT of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 01/26/2026 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:24-CV-157. Electronic ROA due on 02/02/2026. [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 01/16/2026 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9] Brief in Support deadline updated to 02/02/2026 for Robert Hoard IV.. Date of service: 12/05/2025 [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 01/16/2026 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/19/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee deadline satisfied [25-11230] (PAC) [Entered: 01/16/2026 07:53 AM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [25-11230] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [25-11230] (MFY) [Entered: 12/22/2025 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 01/20/2026 for Appellant Robert Hoard IV [25-11230] (NMF) [Entered: 11/26/2025 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Hoard, IV [25-11230] (NMF) [Entered: 11/07/2025 09:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
