Somerville v. Guerrero
| Keith Lawrence Somerville |
| Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 25-11336 |
| December 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 COURT ORDER denying motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Keith Lawrence Somerville [ # 11 ]. Mandate issue date is 06/25/2026. [25-11336] (RLJ) [Entered: 06/04/2026 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 18 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Keith Lawrence Somerville informing court of new address. [25-11336] (RLJ) [Entered: 05/13/2026 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 13 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the IFP because unnecessary - already proceeding in forma pauperis [25-11336] (MBC) [Entered: 02/18/2026 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Keith Lawrence Somerville in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 11 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [12] [25-11336] (MBC) [Entered: 02/18/2026 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Keith Lawrence Somerville for certificate of appealability [11]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [25-11336] (MBC) [Entered: 02/18/2026 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: responding to request for documents [25-11336] (MBC) [Entered: 02/11/2026 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-11336] (DDL) [Entered: 01/30/2026 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:25-CV-2573. Electronic ROA due on 01/26/2026. [25-11336] (NMF) [Entered: 01/09/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Motion due on 02/18/2026 for Appellant Keith Lawrence Somerville. Brief in Support due on 02/18/2026 for Appellant Keith Lawrence Somerville [25-11336] (NMF) [Entered: 01/09/2026 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the objection to findings and motion to recusal received from Appellant Mr. Keith Lawrence Somerville because premature and should be in included in brief at appropriate time [25-11336] (MBC) [Entered: 12/22/2025 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Keith Lawrence Somerville [25-11336] (NMF) [Entered: 12/11/2025 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Somerville v. Guerrero | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Keith Lawrence Somerville | |
| Represented By: | Keith Lawrence Somerville |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.