USA v. Beverly
| United States of America |
| Eric Beverly |
| 25-20120 |
| April 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 PETITION filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Beverly in 24-20241, 25-20120 for rehearing en banc [29] Mandate issue date canceled.. [24-20241, 25-20120] (MVM) [Entered: 10/01/2025 07:46 AM] |
| Filing 27 COURT ORDER denying Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Beverly [ # 16 ] in 25-20120, denying Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Beverly [ # 10472659-2 ] in 24-20241. Mandate issue date is 10/31/2025. [24-20241, 25-20120] (RA) [Entered: 09/09/2025 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 19 MEMO IN SUPPORT of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 16 ] [ # 10472659-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Beverly in 24-20241 and 25-20120. [24-20241, 25-20120] (RA) [Entered: 08/19/2025 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 17 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Beverly in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 16 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [17] [25-20120] (MVM) [Entered: 07/19/2025 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Beverly for certificate of appealability [16]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [25-20120] (MVM) [Entered: 07/19/2025 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 13 CLERK ORDER consolidating cases 24-20241 and 25-20120 for briefing and oral argument purposes [24-20241, 25-20120] (RA) [Entered: 06/06/2025 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 07/16/2025 for Appellant Eric Beverly. Brief in Support due on 07/16/2025 for Appellant Eric Beverly [25-20120] (RA) [Entered: 06/06/2025 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ORDER reinstating case [9] [25-20120] (RA) [Entered: 06/06/2025 08:03 AM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [7] [25-20120] (MVM) [Entered: 06/02/2025 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 05/16/2025 for Appellant Eric Beverly [25-20120] (MVM) [Entered: 05/13/2025 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 05/01/2025 for Appellant Eric Beverly [25-20120] (MVM) [Entered: 04/16/2025 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Beverly [25-20120] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/10/2025 07:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Beverly | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eric Beverly | |
| Represented By: | Eric Beverly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
