Moten v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
Plaintiff: Anetrys Moten, Individually and as next friend of T.T.
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Corporation
Case Number: 25-20242
Filed: June 13, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Liability

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 25, 2026 Moten v. Union Pacific Railroad Co

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2025 Filing 38 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Anetrys Moten. # of Copies Provided: 0. Reply Brief deadline satisfied [25-20242] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Anetrys Moten. Date of service: 12/08/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Koneru; Attorney for Appellees: Pitts, Proctor, Rutter; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Turner [25-20242] (Nathan Koneru ) [Entered: 12/08/2025 09:46 PM]
November 17, 2025 Filing 37 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten. Extension Granted to and including 12/08/2025. Reply Brief deadline updated to 12/08/2025 for Appellant Anetrys Moten [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 11/17/2025 09:50 AM]
November 14, 2025 Filing 36 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten for filing Appellant's Reply Brief until 12/08/2025 [25-20242] (Nathan Koneru ) [Entered: 11/14/2025 03:08 PM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 34 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ryan Philip Pitts for party(s) Appellee Union Pacific Corporation, in case 25-20242 [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 11/13/2025 04:23 PM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 33 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kent Geoffrey Rutter for party(s) Appellee Union Pacific Corporation, in case 25-20242 [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 11/13/2025 04:15 PM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 32 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Ryan Philip Pitts for Union Pacific Railroad Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-20242] (Ryan Philip Pitts ) [Entered: 11/13/2025 03:50 PM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 31 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Kent Geoffrey Rutter, Esq. for Union Pacific Railroad Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-20242] (Kent Geoffrey Rutter ) [Entered: 11/13/2025 03:48 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 30 APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company. # of Copies Provided: 0. E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 12/01/2025 for Appellant Anetrys Moten [25-20242] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Union Pacific Railroad Company. Date of service: 11/10/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Koneru; Attorney for Appellees: Pitts, Proctor, Rutter; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Turner [25-20242] (Kent Geoffrey Rutter ) [Entered: 11/10/2025 04:47 PM]
October 13, 2025 Filing 28 Exhibits, 1 envelope ( Video of Incident ), FILED [25-20242] (DDL) [Entered: 10/13/2025 08:58 AM]
September 30, 2025 Filing 27 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Proposed Sufficient Record Excerpts received from Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten because Counsel advised the filing was incorrect copy of sufficient record excerpts. [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 09/30/2025 03:52 PM]
September 29, 2025 Filing 26 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellants Mr. Anetrys Moten and Mr. Anetrys Moten [ # 24 ] Date of service: 09/29/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Koneru; Attorney for Appellees: Pitts, Proctor, Rutter, Turner [25-20242] (Nathan Koneru ) [Entered: 09/29/2025 09:08 AM]
September 24, 2025 Filing 24 SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten. # of Copies Provided: 0. Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [25-20242] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require Table of contents and Numbered Tab. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0. Record Excerpts deadline satisfied. Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 10/08/2025 for Appellant Anetrys Moten [25-20242] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten. Date of service: 09/24/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Koneru; Attorney for Appellees: Pitts, Proctor, Rutter, Turner [25-20242] (Nathan Koneru ) [Entered: 09/24/2025 03:23 PM]
September 24, 2025 Filing 23 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellees Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company. Extension Granted to and including 11/10/2025. E/Res's Brief deadline updated to 11/10/2025 for Appellees Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 09/24/2025 01:23 PM]
September 24, 2025 Filing 22 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company for filing Appellee's Brief until 11/10/2025 [25-20242] (Kent Geoffrey Rutter ) [Entered: 09/24/2025 01:07 PM]
September 10, 2025 Filing 21 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Anetrys Moten. # of Copies Provided: 0. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 09/24/2025 for Appellant Anetrys Moten. Appellee's Brief due on 10/10/2025 for Appellees Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company [25-20242] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Anetrys Moten. Date of service: 09/10/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Koneru; Attorney for Appellees: Pitts, Proctor, Rutter, Turner [25-20242] (Nathan Koneru ) [Entered: 09/10/2025 09:29 PM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 20 CLERK ORDER granting in part Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten [ # 15 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 09/10/2025 for Appellant Anetrys Moten [25-20242] (SH) [Entered: 07/28/2025 03:30 PM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Nathan Koneru for Appellant Anetrys Moten in 25-20242 [25-20242] (ABT) [Entered: 07/28/2025 09:51 AM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 15 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten to extend time to file brief as appellant until 09/25/2025 [15]. Date of service: 07/28/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Koneru; Attorney for Appellees: Pitts, Proctor, Rutter [25-20242] (Nathan Koneru ) [Entered: 07/28/2025 08:25 AM]
July 25, 2025 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-20242] (Nathan Koneru ) [Entered: 07/25/2025 12:55 PM]
July 14, 2025 Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ryan Philip Pitts for party(s) Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company, in case 25-20242 [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 07/14/2025 03:14 PM]
July 14, 2025 Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kent Geoffrey Rutter for party(s) Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company, in case 25-20242 [25-20242] (STH) [Entered: 07/14/2025 09:26 AM]
July 11, 2025 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-20242] (Ryan Philip Pitts ) [Entered: 07/11/2025 05:01 PM]
July 11, 2025 Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-20242] (Kent Geoffrey Rutter ) [Entered: 07/11/2025 04:59 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/11/2025 for Appellant Anetrys Moten. [25-20242] (DDL) [Entered: 07/02/2025 02:43 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-20242] (DDL) [Entered: 07/02/2025 02:42 PM]
June 24, 2025 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:23-CV-1320. Electronic ROA due on 07/09/2025. [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 06/24/2025 01:52 PM]
June 24, 2025 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-20242] (AMD) [Entered: 06/24/2025 01:50 PM]
June 13, 2025 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Anetrys Moten [25-20242] (CMC) [Entered: 06/13/2025 12:29 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Moten v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anetrys Moten, Individually and as next friend of T.T.
Represented By: Nathan Koneru
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Ronnie Turner Jr.
Represented By: John William Proctor
Represented By: Ryan Philip Pitts
Represented By: Kent Geoffrey Rutter Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Corporation
Represented By: Ronnie Turner Jr.
Represented By: John William Proctor
Represented By: Ryan Philip Pitts
Represented By: Kent Geoffrey Rutter Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?