Loeb v. Vo
| Heather Swartwood Loeb |
| Anh Xuan Vo and Isha Management, L.L.C., |
| 25-20582 |
| December 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Personal Liability |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 COURT ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb [ # 21 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/22/2026 for Appellant Heather Swartwood Loeb [25-20582] (AMD) [Entered: 06/17/2026 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 21 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb to extend time to file brief as appellant until 10/22/2026 [21]. Date of service: 06/11/2026 [25-20582] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb to extend time to file brief as appellant until 10/22/2026 [21]. Date of service: 06/11/2026 via clerk - Attorney for Appellant: Christensen; Attorney for Appellee: Johnson [25-20582] (Kevin John Christensen ) [Entered: 06/11/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 20 CLERK ORDER granting in part Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb [ # 16 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/24/2026 for Appellant Heather Swartwood Loeb [25-20582] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/13/2026 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 16 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb to extend time to file brief as appellant until 09/23/2026 [16]. Date of service: 05/12/2026 [25-20582] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb to extend time to file brief as appellant until 09/21/2026 [16]. Date of service: 05/12/2026 via clerk - Attorney for Appellant: Christensen; Attorney for Appellee: Johnson [25-20582] (Kevin John Christensen ) [Entered: 05/12/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. SPECIAL ISSUES TO BE BRIEFED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/26/2026 for Appellant Heather Swartwood Loeb. [25-20582] (DDL) [Entered: 04/16/2026 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-20582] (DDL) [Entered: 04/16/2026 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:24-CV-1891. Electronic ROA due on 04/17/2026. [25-20582] (AMD) [Entered: 04/02/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Sumyya Wright, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 04/01/2026 Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled [25-20582] (AMD) [Entered: 04/02/2026 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 11 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/17/2026 granting IFP for Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb. [25-20582] (AMD) [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Sumyya Wright, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 12/16/2025. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 02/09/2026 for Sumyya Wright. [25-20582] (KJ) [Entered: 01/30/2026 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 6 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Sumyya Wright. [25-20582] (Sumyya Wright ) [Entered: 01/20/2026 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: OK to Process with Special Issues to be Briefed. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (Monitoring for ruling on motion for IFP pending in DC). [25-20582] (SEP) [Entered: 01/16/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb [25-20582] (AMD) [Entered: 12/23/2025 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.