Primus v. Paretti
| Kenneth Wayne Primus |
| Stephen Paretti, Captain, Hannah Kairdolf, Corporal, Julian Harrington, Deputy, Corporal Van Halen, Daniel Fleischman, Warden, Rhonda Simmons, Assistant Warden, Aaron Mendow, Lieutenant, Michael Cartner, Deputy and Brandon Dussouy, Deputy |
| 25-30338 |
| June 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prison Conditions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Wayne Primus [ # 12 ] [25-30338] (RA) [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Wayne Primus to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [12]. Date of service: 07/22/2025 [25-30338] (RA) [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 11 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [11] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-30338] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/17/2025 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [6] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Wayne Primus. [6] [25-30338] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/09/2025 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 08/04/2025 for Appellant Kenneth Wayne Primus [25-30338] (AMD) [Entered: 06/09/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Wayne Primus [25-30338] (AMD) [Entered: 06/04/2025 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
