Brown v. Myers
| Dale Brown |
| Marcus Myers, Terry Bordelon, Colonel, Terry Bordelon, III, Lieutenant, Kenneth D. Moore, Sr. and Captain Gunn |
| 25-30427 |
| August 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Dale Brown to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [17] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 01/28/2026 for Appellant Dale Brown. Date of service: 12/17/2025 [25-30427] (SH) [Entered: 01/07/2026 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 15 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [25-30427] (KJ) [Entered: 11/24/2025 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 13 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/21/2025 Dale Brown; Motion for IFP stricken for failure to comply Fee deadline updated to 01/20/2026 for Appellant Dale Brown [25-30427] (KJ) [Entered: 11/24/2025 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Dale Brown. Fee deadline satisfied. [25-30427] (RA) [Entered: 09/10/2025 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Dale Brown informing the court that a motion for in forma pauperis is pending in the district court. [25-30427] (RA) [Entered: 09/10/2025 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 10/07/2025, for Appellant Dale Brown. [25-30427] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/13/2025 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Dale Brown. [25-30427] (RLL) [Entered: 08/04/2025 08:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
