Payton v. LeBlanc
| Nathaniel Payton |
| James LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Marcus Myers, Warden, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Heather Cormier, Head Nurse Practitioner, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center and Iris Harmason, Unit Head Registered Nurse, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center |
| 25-30498 |
| September 5, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-30498] (Timothy Russell Wynn ) [Entered: 03/03/2026 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 13 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 01/07/2026 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Payton. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [25-30498] (IAC) [Entered: 01/09/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: Status request [25-30498] (RAJ) [Entered: 12/31/2025 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Payton advising the district court granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. [25-30498] (RAJ) [Entered: 12/16/2025 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/31/2025 reconsideration [25-30498] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for Doc #51 Motion for Reconsideration. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [25-30498] (KJ) [Entered: 09/17/2025 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Payton [25-30498] (KJ) [Entered: 09/05/2025 02:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.