In re: Harold Scott
| In re: Harold Scott |
| 25-30529 |
| September 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 COURT ORDER denying as unnecessary Motion to file successive petition filed by Movant Mr. Harold Scott [ # 2 ]. [25-30529] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to file successive petition [ # 2 ] filed by Movant Mr. Harold Scott Date of Service: 10/03/2025 [25-30529] (RA) [Entered: 10/06/2025 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [25-30529] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/19/2025 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Movant Mr. Harold Scott for authorization to file successive petition 2254 petition[2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 09/15/2025.. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Proposed petition not attached Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 10/20/2025 for Movant Harold Scott. [25-30529] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/19/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [25-30529] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/19/2025 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Harold Scott | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Harold Scott | |
| Represented By: | Harold Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
