Nolan v. Buchanan
| Antonio Lashun Nolan |
| Jared Buchanan, Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Zane Crittenden, Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Luke Price, Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Police Department of Minden and Jimbo Yocom |
| 25-30724 |
| December 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 44 BRIEFING COMPLETE. [25-30724] (RLL) [Entered: 04/10/2026 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 40 COURT ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Appellant's motion to remand case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport Division for the limited purpose of Rule 60(a) clerical/administrative corrections, or in the alternative to directly correct the record, is CARRIED WITH THE CASE. [ # 22 ] [ # 22 ] [25-30724] (RLL) [Entered: 03/10/2026 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 35 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. [25-30724] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan. Date of service: 03/03/2026 via email - Appellant Nolan; clerk - Appellant Nolan [25-30724] (Antonio Lashun Nolan ) [Entered: 03/03/2026 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 29 COURT ORDER carrying with the case Motion to remand case filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan. [ # 14 ] [25-30724] (RLL) [Entered: 02/11/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION to amend caption [22], to correct case type as Appellant was not incarcerated at time of filing original complaint [22]. Date of service: 02/09/2026. [25-30724] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan to amend caption [22]. Date of service: 02/09/2026 via clerk - Appellant Nolan [25-30724] (Antonio Lashun Nolan ) [Entered: 02/09/2026 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 21 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 03/16/2026 for Appellant Antonio Lashun Nolan. [25-30724] (DDL) [Entered: 02/03/2026 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 20 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-30724] (DDL) [Entered: 02/03/2026 07:20 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan to remand case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport Division for the limited purpose of Rule 60(a) Clerical/Administrative Corrections. Date of service: 01/12/2026. [25-30724] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan to amend caption [14]. Date of service: 01/12/2026 via clerk - Appellant Nolan [25-30724] (Antonio Lashun Nolan ) [Entered: 01/12/2026 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:25-CV-1144. Electronic ROA due on 01/26/2026. [25-30724] (RLL) [Entered: 01/09/2026 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 12 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan. [ # 8 ] [25-30724] (RLL) [Entered: 01/09/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [8]. [25-30724] (RLL) [Entered: 01/08/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-30724] (RLL) [Entered: 01/08/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Lashun Nolan [25-30724] (IAC) [Entered: 12/10/2025 09:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
