Davis v. Dept of Corrections
| Troy Davis |
| Department of Corrections and James LeBlanc, Secretary |
| 25-30735 |
| December 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Mandamus and Other (Prisoner) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 3 STRIKES case. [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 06/05/2026 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 29 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [29] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 06/22/2026 for Appellant Troy Davis [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 06/04/2026 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 26 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Troy Davis to proceed in forma pauperis [26]. Date of service: 04/13/2026 [25-30735] (KJ) [Entered: 04/22/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 24 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. Address Change. [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 04/06/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 22 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [25-30735] (AMD) [Entered: 03/31/2026 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 21 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. [25-30735] (AMD) [Entered: 03/17/2026 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 19 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [19] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Troy Davis. [19] [25-30735] (AMD) [Entered: 03/17/2026 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 18 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/06/2026 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Troy Davis. Fee due on 04/09/2026 for Appellant Troy Davis [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 03/10/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 17 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the financial affidavit received from Appellant Mr. Troy Davis because Premature [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 02/13/2026 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 16 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant Brief received from Appellant Mr. Troy Davis because Premature [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 02/13/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 15 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appellant's brief received from Appellant Mr. Troy Davis because Premature [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 02/13/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 14 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [14] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-30735] (IAC) [Entered: 02/12/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 10 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [10] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Troy Davis. [10] [25-30735] (IAC) [Entered: 02/06/2026 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Troy Davis to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [25-30735] (RA) [Entered: 02/06/2026 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the financial affidavit received from Appellant Mr. Troy Davis because a motion to proceed in forma pauperis must first be ruled on by the lower court. Your previously received motion to proceed in forma pauperis has been rerouted to the lower court. [25-30735] (RA) [Entered: 02/06/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Notice advising the Court that IFP was filed in district court received from Appellant Mr. Troy Davis because wrong document sent to the court [25-30735] (SR) [Entered: 01/28/2026 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 03/09/2026 for Appellant Troy Davis [25-30735] (JAK) [Entered: 01/13/2026 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Troy Davis [25-30735] (JAK) [Entered: 12/16/2025 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
