USA v. Thompson
| United States of America |
| Jason Thompson |
| 25-40210 |
| April 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 39
MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate issue date satisfied. [25-40210] (MVM) [Entered: 10/06/2025 12:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 37
JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. [25-40210] (MVM) [Entered: 09/15/2025 11:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 36
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [25-40210 Affirmed ] Judge: JES , Judge: SAH , Judge: CTW Mandate issue date is 10/06/2025 [25-40210] (MVM) [Entered: 09/15/2025 10:57 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Jason Thompson. Reply Brief deadline satisfied [25-40210] (MVM) [Entered: 07/01/2025 08:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
APPELLEE'S LETTER BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 06/25/2025 for Appellant Jason Thompson [25-40210] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S LETTER BRIEF FILED by USA. Date of service: 06/04/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Gaston, Visosky; US mail - Appellant Thompson [25-40210] (Bradley Elliot Visosky ) [Entered: 06/04/2025 09:49 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Jason Thompson. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 06/30/2025 for Appellee United States of America [25-40210] (MVM) [Entered: 05/29/2025 02:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-40210] (DDL) [Entered: 05/23/2025 03:37 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/23/2025 for Appellant Jason Thompson. [25-40210] (ABT) [Entered: 05/12/2025 11:34 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 9:20-CR-63-6. Electronic ROA due on 05/27/2025. [25-40210] (ABT) [Entered: 05/12/2025 11:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/02/2025 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Jason Thompson. [25-40210] (ABT) [Entered: 05/09/2025 11:04 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [10] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Motion for IFP pending in DC. [25-40210] (SH) [Entered: 04/23/2025 02:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bradley Elliot Visosky for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 25-40210 [25-40210] (SR) [Entered: 04/17/2025 01:32 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-40210] (Bradley Elliot Visosky ) [Entered: 04/17/2025 10:58 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Thompson [25-40210] (SH) [Entered: 04/17/2025 09:15 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Thompson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Elizabeth Gaston |
| Represented By: | Bradley Elliot Visosky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jason Thompson | |
| Represented By: | Jason Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
